The Personal Belief vs. AI Paradox

We had a workshop recently. You know, the kind where ideas fly, coffee flows, and someone (always someone) accidentally opens a philosophical can of worms.
This time, it was our Operations Manager - and the can was labelled: AI and Personal Beliefs.

She admitted she was conflicted.

Not in a Skynet is coming kinda way. More like:

“If AI does the work for me… is that even my work anymore?”

Fair. Thoughtful. Respectable.

Also… flawed.

Because here’s the thing: we’re already outsourcing our brainpower daily - calculators, GPS, Grammarly, Google. No one’s out here solving equations on parchment paper by candlelight.

So I hit her with it:
“Why do calculators exist?”

That’s not rhetorical.
They exist because it’s faster.
Because there’s no glory in manually crunching numbers when something else can do it better, faster, and without getting distracted halfway through.

‍

The Real Problem Isn’t AI. It’s Our Expectation of AI.

A lot of people say things like:

“I tried ChatGPT. It didn’t give me what I wanted.”

Yeah? That’s not because AI sucks.
It’s because you're expecting AGI, not AI.

It’s like asking Siri to write your business plan and then being upset she can’t negotiate your Series A.

AI is not magic.
It’s a tool. And like any tool, it’s only as good as the person using it.

We don’t have AGI (yet). What we have is a hyper-capable, context-hungry sidekick.
And to make it sing?
You need to prompt like a god.

If you can’t communicate what you want, clearly and with intent - guess what?
Neither can AI.

The real power isn’t in “using AI.”
It’s in knowing what to ask, when to ask it, and how to iterate based on the result.

‍

Prompting Is the New Literacy

Knowing how to prompt is like knowing how to Google before Google got good.

It’s underrated.
Under-practiced.
And absolutely essential.

Because the skill isn’t about memorising facts anymore. It’s about accessing, applying, and adapting knowledge on the fly.
That’s the real flex.

So let’s talk about the education system for a sec (aka the broken temple of memorisation).

The way we’re taught to “learn” is mostly just:
Can you regurgitate facts fast enough to fill in a bubble sheet?

Spoiler: That’s not learning. That’s parroting.
And parrots don’t build companies.

What matters now?
Critical thinking. Problem solving. Application.

Not who can remember the most - but who can use the most.

Because let’s be honest:
If a machine can recall every historical fact, write Python in its sleep, and draft your client email in 0.2 seconds…
Why are we still flexing about who can name all the countries in Africa?

Knowledge is no longer the edge.
Utilisation is.

‍

Like It or Not - The World Isn’t Waiting for You

Whether you love AI, hate it, or feel morally icky about it - the trajectory doesn’t care.

This train’s not slowing down so you can hop off at “Ethical Hesitation Central.”

With AI and AR fusing at lightspeed, we’re heading toward a world where information becomes ambient. Ubiquitous. Always-on.

You won’t need to remember how to do something.
You’ll just do it - with tools anticipating your next move like a damn mind reader.

That’s not dystopian. That’s Tuesday in 2027.

‍

So Here’s the Hard Truth

The world will not bend around your beliefs.
It won’t pause for your comfort.
It won’t delay to accommodate your inner philosophical crisis.

You either adapt - or get left behind.

That doesn’t mean throwing your values in the trash.
It means learning to swim with the current, instead of yelling at the water for moving.

Because there’s a very thin line between personal belief and blatant ignorance.

Cross it - and you’re not standing for something anymore.
You’re just standing in your own way.